I’ve decided to start posting to this blog a little more often, as I’ve definitely neglected it over the last couple of years. I don’t really have a plan, but it’s my blog, and I don’t need to have one. So, here’s something to get me warmed up…it’s a simple summary of the analysis of the energy between a travel mug and a paper cup (via). In other words: “Its a simple question — which is ‘worse’? A paper cup, or a travel mug?”
“You can easily go either side on this debate: the paper cup is cheaper to manufacture, therefore it probably ‘impacts’ the environment less; more paper cups are made every year than travel mugs (probably), so the impact of the paper cups as a whole are probably more; the travel mug is made of aluminum, whereas paper cups are just paper — mining aluminum seems more intensive than cutting down trees, the mug must be worse.
…But, your paper cup is disposable: a paper cup’s lifespan, while in your possession, is probably on the order of days whereas the travel mug, will stick around for years.
…This simple life cycle analysis is what WattzOn is good at right now (contribute by editing the paper cup or editing the travel mug, or creating a new item in the EED) — but it does bring up questions of how much water is being used to wash out that mug, the manufacturing processes involved in those two cups, and the shipping, marking, and distribution methodologies that are not being well accounted for now.”
I found this to be quite an interesting exercise in thought, that requires tracing everything that’s involved in the creation-to-consumption process. Which leads to me thinking about the t-shirt I’m wearing, and wondering everything that went into it getting onto my back.
We are connected. Each of us to another.